
There's a recent news story up at Connexions reviewing an article by Norm Friesen over at learningspaces.org. In the article, he independently ranks a bunch of open educational resources with "value to schools, universities and to other organizations with educational mandates". Sounds just like what we do, right? So we weren't too surprised to hear that Connexions tied in first place, with a score of 14 out of a possible 15.
What grabbed my attention was his ranking criteria: Norm found very few repositories that had both a) a non-restrictive license that lets users re-use and re-mix content easily, and b) some sort of quality assurance, through peer reviews or other methods. These are the qualities he says make open educational resources most useful for educational institutions, and luckily, Connexions is one of the few repositories to have.
Here at Connexions, all content is published under a CC-by license, which is as non-restrictive a license as possible while still recognizing and attributing work to the author. That means that it is legally possibly to re-use content. Of course, we go one step further in publishing all content with a standardized format to make "frictionless remix"* even easier (it's hard to remix a .pdf with a Powerpoint presentation, for example).
In the past year we have also rolled out several ways to vet content:
- Individual users can rate modules on a 5-star scale.
- When browsing or searching content, you have the option to sort by Popularity, which is based on the number of page hits a module receives. This lets you quickly find content that is viewed often.
- Most powerfully, users and organizations can create Lenses to highlight useful material. Organizations can create Endorsement lenses (peer-reviewed content, vouched for by the organization) or Affiliate lenses (content associated with the organization in some way, but not necessarily peer-reviewed). All other lenses are Member Lists, which allow you to pull together content that you deem to be of value; content of good quality, content all in the same subject, or simply content that you like. Finally, lenses also allow users to provide their own tags and commentary for all content within the lens.
What other methods of quality control do you think would be useful in Connexions?
* Kudos to Brad Wheeler for the great term, which got tossed around a lot during the Connexions Conference 2010.
